GeForce GT 750M SLI vs Radeon R9 M385

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M385 and GeForce GT 750M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M385
2015
4 GB GDDR5
5.36

GT 750M SLI outperforms R9 M385 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking617558
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameStratoN14P-GT
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896768
Core clock speed900 MHz967 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 million1300 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate56.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.792 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs56no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−32.5%
53
+32.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Elden Ring 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−37.5%
21−24
+37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−27.3%
27−30
+27.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Valorant 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−37.5%
21−24
+37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Dota 2 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Elden Ring 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%
Fortnite 30−35
−32.3%
40−45
+32.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−27.3%
27−30
+27.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−24.4%
55−60
+24.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Valorant 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
World of Tanks 85−90
−87.4%
163
+87.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−37.5%
21−24
+37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Dota 2 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−27.3%
27−30
+27.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−24.4%
55−60
+24.4%
Valorant 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Elden Ring 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−14.7%
35−40
+14.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
World of Tanks 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Valorant 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Elden Ring 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Fortnite 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Valorant 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how R9 M385 and GT 750M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GT 750M SLI is 33% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 750M SLI is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 750M SLI is ahead in 59 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.36 6.94
Recency 5 May 2015 1 April 2013

R9 M385 has an age advantage of 2 years.

GT 750M SLI, on the other hand, has a 29.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GT 750M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M385 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M385
Radeon R9 M385
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
GeForce GT 750M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R9 M385 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 16 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.