GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost vs Radeon HD 4225
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | RV6xx (2007−2010) | no data |
| GPU code name | RS880M | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 May 2010 (13 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (15 years ago) |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 380 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Shared memory | + | - |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Radeon HD 4225 outperforms GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost by 12% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 1 May 2010 | 3 June 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 65 nm |
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4225 and GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
