ATI Radeon HD 4225 vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1317 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.80 | no data |
| Architecture | no data | RV6xx (2008−2010) |
| GPU code name | MCP79MX | RS880M |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 October 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 380 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 282 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 512 MB |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 October 2008 | 1 May 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 55 nm |
ATI HD 4225 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and Radeon HD 4225. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
