Radeon 880M vs 760M

Place in the ranking	355	277
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	68.22	92.69
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code name	Hawx Point	Strix Point
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2023 (1 year ago)	15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	512
Core clock speed	800 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	2599 MHz	2900 MHz
Number of transistors	25,390 million	34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	83.17	92.80
Floating-point processing power	5.323 TFLOPS	2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
Ray Tracing Cores	8	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 760M 14.83

Radeon 880M 20.15
+35.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 760M 5701

Radeon 880M 7747
+35.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 760M 9603

Radeon 880M 13892
+44.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 760M 6142

Radeon 880M 8371
+36.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 760M 41767

Radeon 880M 51662
+23.7%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Radeon 760M 2116

Radeon 880M 3006
+42.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	31 −16.1%	36 +16.1%
1440p	19 −15.8%	22 +15.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	25 −68%	42 +68%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 −33.3%	40−45 +33.3%
Elden Ring	45−50 −42.2%	60−65 +42.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	19 −73.7%	33 +73.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	51 −45.1%	74 +45.1%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −35%	50−55 +35%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −27.8%	45−50 +27.8%
Valorant	55−60 −37.3%	80−85 +37.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	18 −38.9%	25 +38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Dota 2	23 −130%	53 +130%
Elden Ring	45−50 −42.2%	60−65 +42.2%
Far Cry 5	29 −51.7%	44 +51.7%
Fortnite	80−85 −27.7%	100−110 +27.7%
Forza Horizon 4	44 −43.2%	63 +43.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	34 −52.9%	52 +52.9%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −35%	50−55 +35%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −26.2%	130−140 +26.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −27.8%	45−50 +27.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −40%	60−65 +40%
Valorant	55−60 −37.3%	80−85 +37.3%
World of Tanks	190−200 −20.8%	230−240 +20.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +23.8%	21 −23.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
Dota 2	50−55 −32.1%	70−75 +32.1%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −21.8%	65−70 +21.8%
Forza Horizon 4	37 −43.2%	53 +43.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −26.2%	130−140 +26.2%
Valorant	55−60 −37.3%	80−85 +37.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 −4.8%	22 +4.8%
Elden Ring	21−24 −43.5%	30−35 +43.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −45.5%	30−35 +45.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −29.8%	170−180 +29.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
World of Tanks	100−110 −30.8%	130−140 +30.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −36.7%	40−45 +36.7%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −46.2%	19 +46.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −50%	50−55 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −44.4%	50−55 +44.4%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −43.8%	45−50 +43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Valorant	35−40 −40.5%	50−55 +40.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Dota 2	24−27 −30.8%	30−35 +30.8%
Elden Ring	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −30.8%	30−35 +30.8%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −36.4%	60−65 +36.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −30.8%	30−35 +30.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −42.9%	20−22 +42.9%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Dota 2	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −36.8%	24−27 +36.8%
Fortnite	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%
Valorant	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%

This is how Radeon 760M and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

Radeon 880M is 16% faster in 1080p
Radeon 880M is 16% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 760M is 24% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 880M is 130% faster.

All in all, in popular games: