RTX A1000 Embedded vs Radeon 660M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 660M with RTX A1000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 660M
2023
40 Watt
6.89

RTX A1000 Embedded outperforms 660M by a whopping 329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking561194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.8658.16
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRembrandt+GA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed1500 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz1140 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate45.6072.96
Floating-point processing power1.459 TFLOPS4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 660M 6.89
RTX A1000 Embedded 29.57
+329%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 660M 2647
RTX A1000 Embedded 11368
+329%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
−317%
100−110
+317%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−317%
100−105
+317%
Elden Ring 22
−309%
90−95
+309%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−300%
40−45
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 42
−329%
180−190
+329%
Metro Exodus 32
−306%
130−140
+306%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
Valorant 36
−317%
150−160
+317%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Counter-Strike 2 11
−309%
45−50
+309%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−329%
30−33
+329%
Dota 2 35
−329%
150−160
+329%
Elden Ring 22
−309%
90−95
+309%
Far Cry 5 29
−314%
120−130
+314%
Fortnite 40−45
−315%
170−180
+315%
Forza Horizon 4 33
−324%
140−150
+324%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
−300%
100−105
+300%
Metro Exodus 20
−325%
85−90
+325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−329%
240−250
+329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−329%
90−95
+329%
Valorant 19
−321%
80−85
+321%
World of Tanks 100−110
−321%
450−500
+321%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Dota 2 48
−317%
200−210
+317%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%
Forza Horizon 4 28
−329%
120−130
+329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−329%
240−250
+329%
Valorant 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Elden Ring 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−321%
160−170
+321%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
World of Tanks 50−55
−320%
210−220
+320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Valorant 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Elden Ring 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Dota 2 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Fortnite 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Valorant 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%

This is how Radeon 660M and RTX A1000 Embedded compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 Embedded is 317% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.89 29.57
Recency 3 January 2023 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 9 months, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A1000 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 329.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX A1000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 660M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 660M is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
RTX A1000 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 336 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 16 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.