GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 vs Radeon 680M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking339not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Power efficiency21.85no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRembrandt+GA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)1 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683584
Core clock speed2000 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1777 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate105.6199.0
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS12.74 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs48112
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Cores1228

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1875 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data360.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 1 September 2021
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 170 Watt

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 240% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 680M and GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 680M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104
GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 951 vote

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1708 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.