Radeon 660M vs RTX A3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A3000 Mobile and Radeon 660M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A3000 Mobile
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
32.65
+234%

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon 660M by a whopping 234% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking154424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGA104RDNA 2 Rembrandt
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096384
Core clock speed1080 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)45 Watt
Texture fill rate237.645.60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX A3000 Mobile and Radeon 660M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA8.6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A3000 Mobile 32.65
+234%
Radeon 660M 9.78

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon 660M by 234% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX A3000 Mobile 25990
+291%
Radeon 660M 6652

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon 660M by 291% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX A3000 Mobile 71308
+207%
Radeon 660M 23222

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon 660M by 207% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX A3000 Mobile 19710
+316%
Radeon 660M 4735

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Radeon 660M by 316% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX A3000 Mobile 29996
Radeon 660M 30130
+0.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
+292%
25
−292%
1440p44
+267%
12−14
−267%
4K46
+283%
12−14
−283%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 77 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 66 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 164 no data
Metro Exodus 100−105 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 164 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 93 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 53 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 39 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140 no data
Metro Exodus 49 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 134 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 151 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 43 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 114 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 39 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27 no data
Far Cry 5 69 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 60−65 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 86 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data

This is how RTX A3000 Mobile and Radeon 660M compete in popular games:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 292% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 267% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 283% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.65 9.78
Recency 12 April 2021 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 45 Watt

The RTX A3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 660M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 120 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 233 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.