RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
18.50

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by a whopping 291% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30118
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.46
Power efficiency28.6716.79
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 December 2021 (3 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204818176
Core clock speed1185 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1477 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate94.531,423
Floating-point processing power6.05 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs64568
Tensor Cores256568
Ray Tracing Cores32142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2050 Mobile 18.50
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 72.25
+291%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2050 Mobile 12495
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+467%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 126448
+170%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2050 Mobile 8965
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+309%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
−352%
190
+352%
1440p33
−385%
160
+385%
4K25
−360%
115
+360%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data35.78
1440pno data42.49
4Kno data59.12

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
−356%
164
+356%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
−288%
190−200
+288%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−95%
110−120
+95%
Counter-Strike 2 34
−379%
163
+379%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−281%
80−85
+281%
Forza Horizon 4 76
−446%
400−450
+446%
Forza Horizon 5 49
−290%
190−200
+290%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−122%
113
+122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−205%
130−140
+205%
Valorant 87
−344%
350−400
+344%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−95%
110−120
+95%
Counter-Strike 2 27
−474%
155
+474%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−267%
55−60
+267%
Dota 2 85
−100%
170−180
+100%
Far Cry 5 70
−75.7%
123
+75.7%
Fortnite 100−105
−191%
290−300
+191%
Forza Horizon 4 63
−559%
400−450
+559%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−282%
190−200
+282%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
−146%
170−180
+146%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−108%
106
+108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−68%
210−220
+68%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−205%
130−140
+205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−200%
170−180
+200%
Valorant 43
−798%
350−400
+798%
World of Tanks 220−230
−25.1%
270−280
+25.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−95%
110−120
+95%
Counter-Strike 2 23
−539%
147
+539%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−285%
50−55
+285%
Dota 2 110
−264%
400−450
+264%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−117%
130−140
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 56
−641%
400−450
+641%
Forza Horizon 5 33
−479%
190−200
+479%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−68%
210−220
+68%
Valorant 75−80
−408%
350−400
+408%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
−284%
140−150
+284%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−281%
140−150
+281%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−4.2%
170−180
+4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−447%
90−95
+447%
World of Tanks 120−130
−303%
500−550
+303%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−129%
85−90
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−227%
160−170
+227%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−485%
270−280
+485%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
−377%
140−150
+377%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−136%
99
+136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−742%
219
+742%
Valorant 45−50
−588%
300−350
+588%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−888%
79
+888%
Dota 2 30−35
−416%
160−170
+416%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−413%
160−170
+413%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−543%
90
+543%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−273%
200−210
+273%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−433%
60−65
+433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−416%
160−170
+416%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−406%
90−95
+406%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−275%
30
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Dota 2 34
−282%
130−140
+282%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−338%
100−110
+338%
Fortnite 21−24
−336%
95−100
+336%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−436%
150−160
+436%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Valorant 21−24
−768%
190−200
+768%

This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 352% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 385% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 360% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 888% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 6000 Ada Generation surpassed RTX 2050 Mobile in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.50 72.25
Recency 17 December 2021 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 290.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2384 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 104 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.