RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A2000 Mobile

Aggregated performance score

RTX A2000 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6
25.51

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by a considerable 43% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking194121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGA107no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603072
Core clock speed893 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1687 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,250 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate108.6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX A2000 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2no data
CUDA8.6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 Mobile 25.51
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 36.48
+43%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 43% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX A2000 Mobile 63738
+68.4%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37844

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by 68% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX A2000 Mobile 18058
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 30262
+67.6%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 68% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX A2000 Mobile 13157
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 22039
+67.5%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 68% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX A2000 Mobile 60336
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 133204
+121%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 121% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD79
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
1440p41
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
4K38
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 74
−35.1%
100−105
+35.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
−36.4%
75−80
+36.4%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−34.1%
110−120
+34.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−41.8%
95−100
+41.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
−37.1%
85−90
+37.1%
Far Cry 5 96
−35.4%
130−140
+35.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 72
−38.9%
100−105
+38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−41.2%
120−130
+41.2%
Hitman 3 83
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 69
−37.7%
95−100
+37.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−37.1%
85−90
+37.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 39
−41%
55−60
+41%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−34.1%
110−120
+34.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−41.8%
95−100
+41.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
−40%
70−75
+40%
Far Cry 5 88
−36.4%
120−130
+36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 71
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−41.2%
120−130
+41.2%
Hitman 3 76
−31.6%
100−105
+31.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
−40.4%
80−85
+40.4%
Metro Exodus 44
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
−41.7%
85−90
+41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
−35.4%
130−140
+35.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−34.1%
110−120
+34.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Far Cry 5 83
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
−35.6%
80−85
+35.6%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−41.2%
120−130
+41.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−40%
70−75
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 29
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Hitman 3 48
−35.4%
65−70
+35.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Metro Exodus 27
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−40.4%
80−85
+40.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−40%
35−40
+40%
Far Cry 5 53
−41.5%
75−80
+41.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 49
−42.9%
70−75
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20
−35%
27−30
+35%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Hitman 3 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 26
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%

This is how RTX A2000 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 39% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 34% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 32% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.51 36.48
Recency 12 April 2021 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 115 Watt

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 86 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.