RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A1000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A1000 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A1000 Mobile
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
24.82

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX A1000 Mobile by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking223111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.5423.73
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107no data
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483072
Core clock speed630 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1140 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate72.96no data
Floating-point processing power4.669 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A1000 Mobile 24.82
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.55
+59.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A1000 Mobile 9542
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15209
+59.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A1000 Mobile 15135
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 28910
+91%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX A1000 Mobile 58312
+54.1%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37844

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A1000 Mobile 11321
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 21379
+88.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A1000 Mobile 70880
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 115230
+62.6%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX A1000 Mobile 4256
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 8095
+90.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD67
−49.3%
100−110
+49.3%
1440p27
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 66
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
−55.7%
95−100
+55.7%
Elden Ring 60
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%
Counter-Strike 2 50
−50%
75−80
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−40%
35−40
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 109
−56%
170−180
+56%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−53.8%
100−105
+53.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−57.4%
85−90
+57.4%
Valorant 100−105
−50%
150−160
+50%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%
Counter-Strike 2 42
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−50%
27−30
+50%
Dota 2 98
−53.1%
150−160
+53.1%
Elden Ring 80−85
−48.1%
120−130
+48.1%
Far Cry 5 74
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Fortnite 120−130
−52%
190−200
+52%
Forza Horizon 4 87
−49.4%
130−140
+49.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
−53.8%
140−150
+53.8%
Metro Exodus 16
−50%
24−27
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−53.8%
240−250
+53.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−57.4%
85−90
+57.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−50%
120−130
+50%
Valorant 100−105
−50%
150−160
+50%
World of Tanks 250−260
−55.6%
400−450
+55.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
Dota 2 132
−59.1%
210−220
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 76
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−53.8%
240−250
+53.8%
Valorant 100−105
−50%
150−160
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
Elden Ring 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−54.3%
270−280
+54.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
World of Tanks 160−170
−58.5%
260−270
+58.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−50%
75−80
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−52.8%
110−120
+52.8%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−57.9%
90−95
+57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Valorant 65−70
−49.3%
100−105
+49.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Dota 2 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Elden Ring 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Fortnite 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Valorant 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%

This is how RTX A1000 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 49% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 48% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.82 39.55
Recency 30 March 2022 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 115 Watt

RTX A1000 Mobile has 91.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 59.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A1000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 88 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.