Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 6000 Ada Generation and Radeon PRO W7700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022
48 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
70.86
+24%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms PRO W7700 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1839
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.5672.78
Power efficiency16.8821.49
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD102Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 December 2022 (2 years ago)13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,799 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

PRO W7700 has 863% better value for money than RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores181763072
Core clock speed915 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed2505 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate1,423499.2
Floating-point processing power91.06 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs19296
TMUs568192
Tensor Cores568no data
Ray Tracing Cores14248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth960.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70.86
+24%
PRO W7700 57.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28213
+24%
PRO W7700 22747

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD190
+26.7%
150−160
−26.7%
1440p160
+33.3%
120−130
−33.3%
4K115
+27.8%
90−95
−27.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p35.78
−437%
6.66
+437%
1440p42.49
−410%
8.33
+410%
4K59.12
−433%
11.10
+433%
  • PRO W7700 has 437% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • PRO W7700 has 410% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • PRO W7700 has 433% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 164
+26.2%
130−140
−26.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+30%
90−95
−30%
Counter-Strike 2 163
+25.4%
130−140
−25.4%
Forza Horizon 4 400−450
+38.7%
300−310
−38.7%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+28%
150−160
−28%
Metro Exodus 113
+25.6%
90−95
−25.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+34%
100−105
−34%
Valorant 350−400
+29%
300−310
−29%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+30%
90−95
−30%
Counter-Strike 2 155
+29.2%
120−130
−29.2%
Dota 2 170−180
+30.8%
130−140
−30.8%
Far Cry 5 123
+29.5%
95−100
−29.5%
Fortnite 290−300
+26.5%
230−240
−26.5%
Forza Horizon 4 400−450
+38.7%
300−310
−38.7%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+28%
150−160
−28%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+30.8%
130−140
−30.8%
Metro Exodus 106
+24.7%
85−90
−24.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+26.5%
170−180
−26.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+34%
100−105
−34%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+24.3%
140−150
−24.3%
Valorant 350−400
+29%
300−310
−29%
World of Tanks 270−280
+26.8%
220−230
−26.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+30%
90−95
−30%
Counter-Strike 2 147
+33.6%
110−120
−33.6%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+36%
100−105
−36%
Forza Horizon 4 400−450
+38.7%
300−310
−38.7%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+28%
150−160
−28%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+26.5%
170−180
−26.5%
Valorant 350−400
+29%
300−310
−29%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+36%
50−55
−36%
Dota 2 140−150
+29.1%
110−120
−29.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
+29.1%
110−120
−29.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+25%
140−150
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+32.9%
70−75
−32.9%
World of Tanks 500−550
+29%
400−450
−29%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+24.3%
70−75
−24.3%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+33.3%
120−130
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+25.5%
220−230
−25.5%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
+30%
110−120
−30%
Metro Exodus 99
+32%
75−80
−32%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 219
+28.8%
170−180
−28.8%
Valorant 300−350
+27.3%
260−270
−27.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 79
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
Dota 2 160−170
+26.9%
130−140
−26.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+26.9%
130−140
−26.9%
Metro Exodus 90
+28.6%
70−75
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+30.6%
160−170
−30.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+26.9%
130−140
−26.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+30%
70−75
−30%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+31.3%
80−85
−31.3%
Fortnite 95−100
+28%
75−80
−28%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+25.8%
120−130
−25.8%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+28.6%
70−75
−28.6%
Valorant 190−200
+28%
150−160
−28%

This is how RTX 6000 Ada Generation and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 27% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 33% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 28% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 70.86 57.14
Recency 3 December 2022 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 190 Watt

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has a 24% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 57.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 104 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.