Radeon PRO W7700 vs RX 7700 XT

Place in the ranking	39	36
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	71.44	70.00
Power efficiency	16.47	21.48
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 32	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)	13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 2% better value for money than PRO W7700.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3456	3072
Core clock speed	1435 MHz	1900 MHz
Boost clock speed	2544 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	28,100 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	549.5	499.2
Floating-point processing power	35.17 TFLOPS	31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	216	192
Ray Tracing Cores	54	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7700 XT 58.49

PRO W7700 59.16
+1.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7700 XT 22490

PRO W7700 22747
+1.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	188 −1.1%	190−200 +1.1%
1440p	103 +3%	100−110 −3%
4K	60 +0%	60−65 +0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.39 +120%	5.26 −120%
1440p	4.36 +129%	9.99 −129%
4K	7.48 +122%	16.65 −122%

RX 7700 XT has 120% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 7700 XT has 129% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 7700 XT has 122% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	176 +3.5%	170−180 −3.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	193 +1.6%	190−200 −1.6%
Elden Ring	192 +1.1%	190−200 −1.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Counter-Strike 2	145 +3.6%	140−150 −3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	398 −0.5%	400−450 +0.5%
Metro Exodus	157 +4.7%	150−160 −4.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 +7%	100−105 −7%
Valorant	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Counter-Strike 2	121 +0.8%	120−130 −0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	66 +1.5%	65−70 −1.5%
Dota 2	166 +3.8%	160−170 −3.8%
Elden Ring	210−220 −0.5%	220−230 +0.5%
Far Cry 5	100 +0%	100−105 +0%
Fortnite	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	334 +11.3%	300−310 −11.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	166 +3.8%	160−170 −3.8%
Metro Exodus	132 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +2.4%	210−220 −2.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 +7%	100−105 −7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +2.4%	170−180 −2.4%
Valorant	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 −0.4%	280−290 +0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Counter-Strike 2	110 +0%	110−120 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Forza Horizon 4	287 −1%	290−300 +1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +2.4%	210−220 −2.4%
Valorant	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	105 +5%	100−105 −5%
Elden Ring	140−150 +0.7%	140−150 −0.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	105 +5%	100−105 −5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +2.9%	170−180 −2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +3.1%	65−70 −3.1%
World of Tanks	350−400 +9.4%	350−400 −9.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +2.4%	85−90 −2.4%
Counter-Strike 2	73 +4.3%	70−75 −4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	193 +1.6%	190−200 −1.6%
Metro Exodus	134 +3.1%	130−140 −3.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120 +0%	120−130 +0%
Valorant	220−230 +2.7%	220−230 −2.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Dota 2	112 +1.8%	110−120 −1.8%
Elden Ring	70−75 +2.9%	70−75 −2.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	112 +1.8%	110−120 −1.8%
Metro Exodus	57 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +3.5%	200−210 −3.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	112 +1.8%	110−120 −1.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +5%	100−105 −5%
Fortnite	95−100 +1.1%	95−100 −1.1%
Forza Horizon 4	97 +2.1%	95−100 −2.1%
Valorant	120−130 +5.8%	120−130 −5.8%

This is how RX 7700 XT and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

PRO W7700 is 1% faster in 1080p
RX 7700 XT is 3% faster in 1440p
A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	58.49	59.16
Recency	25 August 2023	13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	190 Watt

PRO W7700 has a 1.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 28.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 7700 XT and Radeon PRO W7700.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.