Radeon PRO W7700 vs RX 7700 XT

Place in performance ranking	33	45
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	39.76	23.67
Architecture	RDNA 3	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Navi 32	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	25 August 2023 (less than a year ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	$999
Current price	$443 (1x MSRP)	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 68% better value for money than PRO W7700.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3456	3072
Core clock speed	1700 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2544 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	28,100 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	549.5	499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7700 XT 56.61
+8.1%

PRO W7700 52.36

RX 7700 XT outperforms PRO W7700 by 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 7700 XT 21909
+8.1%

PRO W7700 20263

RX 7700 XT outperforms PRO W7700 by 8% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	186 +9.4%	170−180 −9.4%
1440p	102 +13.3%	90−95 −13.3%
4K	59 +18%	50−55 −18%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

193
+13.5%

170−180

−13.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	165 +10%	150−160 −10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	180 +12.5%	160−170 −12.5%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +9.2%	130−140 −9.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +8.6%	140−150 −8.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	158 +12.9%	140−150 −12.9%
Far Cry 5	188 +10.6%	170−180 −10.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	157 +12.1%	140−150 −12.1%
Forza Horizon 4	278 +11.2%	250−260 −11.2%
Hitman 3	170−180 +11.9%	160−170 −11.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +11.8%	110−120 −11.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +8.2%	85−90 −8.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	242 +10%	220−230 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +10%	90−95 −10%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	148 +13.8%	130−140 −13.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	149 +14.6%	130−140 −14.6%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +9.2%	130−140 −9.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +8.6%	140−150 −8.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	132 +10%	120−130 −10%
Far Cry 5	181 +13.1%	160−170 −13.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	151 +16.2%	130−140 −16.2%
Forza Horizon 4	272 +8.8%	250−260 −8.8%
Hitman 3	170−180 +11.9%	160−170 −11.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +11.8%	110−120 −11.8%
Metro Exodus	152 +8.6%	140−150 −8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +8.2%	85−90 −8.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	209 +10%	190−200 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	295 +9.3%	270−280 −9.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +10%	90−95 −10%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	121 +10%	110−120 −10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	132 +10%	120−130 −10%
Battlefield 5	140−150 +9.2%	130−140 −9.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	122 +10.9%	110−120 −10.9%
Far Cry 5	167 +11.3%	150−160 −11.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	136 +13.3%	120−130 −13.3%
Forza Horizon 4	231 +10%	210−220 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	168 +12%	150−160 −12%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +10%	90−95 −10%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 +11.1%	90−95 −11.1%
Hitman 3	110−120 +18%	100−105 −18%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +10%	80−85 −10%
Metro Exodus	90 +12.5%	80−85 −12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	132 +10%	120−130 −10%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	98 +8.9%	90−95 −8.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	101 +12.2%	90−95 −12.2%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +9%	100−105 −9%
Cyberpunk 2077	80 +14.3%	70−75 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	157 +12.1%	140−150 −12.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	134 +11.7%	120−130 −11.7%
Forza Horizon 4	197 +9.4%	180−190 −9.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +14%	50−55 −14%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +18%	50−55 −18%
Hitman 3	60−65 +16.4%	55−60 −16.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +10%	50−55 −10%
Metro Exodus	57 +14%	50−55 −14%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +18.5%	27−30 −18.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	66 +10%	60−65 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	89 +11.3%	80−85 −11.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58 +16%	50−55 −16%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	59 +18%	50−55 −18%
Battlefield 5	70−75 +9.2%	65−70 −9.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +20%	30−33 −20%
Far Cry 5	82 +9.3%	75−80 −9.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	89 +11.3%	80−85 −11.3%
Forza Horizon 4	134 +11.7%	120−130 −11.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +18.5%	27−30 −18.5%

This is how RX 7700 XT and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

RX 7700 XT is 9.4% faster than PRO W7700 in 1080p
RX 7700 XT is 13.3% faster than PRO W7700 in 1440p
RX 7700 XT is 18% faster than PRO W7700 in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	56.61	52.36
Recency	25 August 2023	13 November 2023
Cost	$449	$999
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	190 Watt