Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023
20 GB GDDR6
54.02
+3.2%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon PRO W7700 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking3845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.69
ArchitectureAda LovelaceRDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code nameAD104Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current priceno data$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61443072
Boost clock speed1565 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate300.5499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount20 GB16 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14 GB/s18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth280.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 54.02
+3.2%
PRO W7700 52.35

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon PRO W7700 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20908
+3.2%
PRO W7700 20263

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon PRO W7700 by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 54.02 52.35
Recency 21 March 2023 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 190 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and Radeon PRO W7700.

Be aware that RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 39 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.