Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
VS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
30 Watt
10.37

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking440436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.2718.38
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361536
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt40 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xLPDDR5x
Memory clock speed8448 MHz8448 MHz
Shared memory++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 10.37
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 10.47
+1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6346
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061
+11.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6294
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982
+10.9%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 1712
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1989
+16.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−8.3%
39
+8.3%
1440p16
+0%
16−18
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 19
−15.8%
22
+15.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 30
−3.3%
31
+3.3%
Fortnite 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
−18.8%
19
+18.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−0.7%
150−160
+0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 28
−7.1%
30
+7.1%
Fortnite 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
−2.9%
36
+2.9%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
−2.5%
41
+2.5%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14
−21.4%
17
+21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 26
−3.8%
27
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−15.8%
22
+15.8%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Valorant 50−55
−1.9%
50−55
+1.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 8% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 21% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is ahead in 24 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 40 tests (63%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.37 10.47
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 40 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has 33.3% lower power consumption.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 1% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
GTX 965M GeForce GTX 965M
Arc 7-Core iGPU Intel 7 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 750 Ti 750 Ti
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
GT 1030 1030
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
R7 Graphics Graphics
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q 3050 Max-Q
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Qualcomm X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
vs
HD Graphics 4000 Graphics 4000
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
UHD Graphics 770 Graphics 770
Quadro M5500 Quadro M5500
vs
Pro 580 580
Radeon E8860 Radeon E8860
vs
GT 755M 755M
HD 8790M AMD HD 8790M
vs
GTX 775M Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition
GeForce 840A GeForce 840A
vs
HD 8770M 8770M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 14 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.