GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
2024
20 Watt
6.25

RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS by a whopping 531% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking602116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.8160.05
Architectureno dataBlackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB207
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2024 (less than a year ago)24 June 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speedno data2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data201.6
Floating-point processing powerno data12.9 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−500%
120−130
+500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−603%
210−220
+603%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−615%
90−95
+615%
God of War 12−14
−646%
95−100
+646%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−396%
130−140
+396%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−603%
210−220
+603%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−615%
90−95
+615%
Far Cry 5 21
−505%
120−130
+505%
Fortnite 35−40
−338%
170−180
+338%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−428%
150−160
+428%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−589%
120−130
+589%
God of War 12−14
−646%
95−100
+646%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−574%
150−160
+574%
Valorant 70−75
−224%
230−240
+224%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−396%
130−140
+396%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−603%
210−220
+603%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−167%
270−280
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−615%
90−95
+615%
Far Cry 5 19
−568%
120−130
+568%
Fortnite 35−40
−338%
170−180
+338%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−428%
150−160
+428%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−589%
120−130
+589%
God of War 12−14
−646%
95−100
+646%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
−442%
130−140
+442%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−574%
150−160
+574%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−545%
140−150
+545%
Valorant 70−75
−224%
230−240
+224%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−396%
130−140
+396%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−615%
90−95
+615%
Far Cry 5 18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−428%
150−160
+428%
God of War 12−14
−646%
95−100
+646%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−574%
150−160
+574%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−1191%
140−150
+1191%
Valorant 70−75
−463%
400−450
+463%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−338%
170−180
+338%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−742%
100−110
+742%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−465%
270−280
+465%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−913%
80−85
+913%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−883%
55−60
+883%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−515%
240−250
+515%
Valorant 70−75
−268%
260−270
+268%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−818%
100−110
+818%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−708%
95−100
+708%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−660%
110−120
+660%
God of War 6−7
−767%
50−55
+767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−850%
75−80
+850%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−715%
100−110
+715%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−378%
85−90
+378%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1500%
60−65
+1500%
Valorant 30−35
−656%
240−250
+656%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1160%
60−65
+1160%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−783%
50−55
+783%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−660%
75−80
+660%
God of War 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−767%
50−55
+767%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and RTX 5050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 Mobile is 500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 3500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 Mobile is ahead in 58 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.25 39.41
Recency 3 September 2024 24 June 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 50 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

RTX 5050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 530.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.

The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 80 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.