GeForce GTX 950A vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
940MX 945M GTX 850A GTX 850M GTX 860M GTX 860M OEM GTX 950A GTX 950M GTX 950M Mac Edition GTX 960A GTX 960M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and GeForce GTX 950A, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
2024
20 Watt
5.95

950A outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
GTX 950A GTX 950A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking637621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.946.35
Architectureno dataMaxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameno dataGM107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2024 (1 year ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768640
Core clock speedno data993 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1124 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data44.96
Floating-point processing powerno data1.439 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1001 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32.03 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
+11.1%
18−21
−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21−24
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Valorant 65−70
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Fortnite 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Valorant 65−70
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Valorant 65−70
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Valorant 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and GTX 950A compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is 11% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.95 6.18
Recency 3 September 2024 13 March 2015
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has an age advantage of 9 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

GTX 950A, on the other hand, has a 3.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and GeForce GTX 950A.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce GTX 950A
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
GTX 950M GeForce GTX 950M
GTX 950A GeForce GTX 950A
vs
GTX 850M GeForce GTX 850M
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
R9 360 OEM 360 OEM
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
8400 GS Rev. 3 8400 GS Rev. 3
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
Arc 7 A780 A780
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile 64EU Mobile
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Apple M1 GPU GPU
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
Steam Deck GPU GPU
RTX 5050 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 5050 Mobile
vs
Ryzen Z2 GPU GPU
RTX 5070 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 5070 Mobile
vs
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU GPU
Xbox Series X 6nm GPU Xbox Series X 6nm GPU
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
Xbox Series X 6nm GPU Xbox Series X 6nm GPU
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB A2000 Mobile 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 4 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or GeForce GTX 950A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.