Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

Place in the ranking	860	612
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	21.88	15.01
Architecture	no data	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	no data	Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2018 (6 years ago)	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	64
Core clock speed	no data	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	12-25 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	DDR4
Shared memory	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.22

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.44
+145%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 4187
+116%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

7−8

−157%

18
+157%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Elden Ring	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −90.9%	21 +90.9%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −467%	17 +467%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −33.3%	12 +33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Dota 2	5−6 −220%	16 +220%
Elden Ring	3−4 −100%	6 +100%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −14.3%	16 +14.3%
Fortnite	10−12 −191%	30−35 +191%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −54.5%	17 +54.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 −80%	9 +80%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −129%	48 +129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
World of Tanks	40−45 +7.7%	39 −7.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Dota 2	5−6 −460%	28 +460%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −14.3%	16 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −36.4%	15 +36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −119%	45−50 +119%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
World of Tanks	14−16 −179%	35−40 +179%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Valorant	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Elden Ring	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Fortnite	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Valorant	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant

14−16

+0%

14−16

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 157% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm Adreno 680 is 8% faster.
in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games: