Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Place in the ranking	613	831
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.98	24.98
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	no data
GPU code name	Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)	6 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	no data
Core clock speed	300 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-25 Watt	7 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.44
+114%

Qualcomm Adreno 685 2.54

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 4187
+117%

Qualcomm Adreno 685 1927

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

18
+125%

8−9

−125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Elden Ring	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	21 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%
Metro Exodus	17 +325%	4−5 −325%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12 +20%	10−11 −20%
Valorant	12 +140%	5−6 −140%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Dota 2	16 +167%	6−7 −167%
Elden Ring	6 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	16 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Fortnite	30−35 +129%	14−16 −129%
Forza Horizon 4	17 +30.8%	12−14 −30.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	9 +50%	6−7 −50%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	48 +100%	24−27 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Valorant	10 +150%	4−5 −150%
World of Tanks	39 −20.5%	45−50 +20.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Dota 2	28 +367%	6−7 −367%
Far Cry 5	16 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	15 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Valorant	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Elden Ring	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
World of Tanks	35−40 +129%	16−18 −129%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Valorant	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Elden Ring	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Dota 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Fortnite	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Valorant	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Qualcomm Adreno 685 compete in popular games:

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 125% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 400% faster.
in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm Adreno 685 is 21% faster.

All in all, in popular games: