NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now no data
Games supported 71%
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1365
  • Max video memory 4096 MB
  • Memory type GDDR5/GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 10000
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 4.0 x8
  • Core clock speed 1968
  • Max video memory 8192 MB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 16000
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 696$
Games supported 100%
Graphics card Graphics card NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating36348
Value for moneyno data36.63
ArchitectureTuringNavi / RDNA2
GPU code nameTU117Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (2 years ago)30 July 2021 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379
Price nowno data$696
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

no data
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962048
Core clock speed1365 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz2589 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)18 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate94.92331.4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro T500 Mobile and Radeon RX 6600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5/GDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA7.5no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T500 Mobile 11.74
RX 6600 XT 58.83
+401%
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T500 Mobile 23453
RX 6600 XT 156297
+566%
T500 Mobile 3974
RX 6600 XT 25652
+546%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T500 Mobile 4225
RX 6600 XT 28342
+571%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T500 Mobile 7996
RX 6600 XT 39051
+388%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1080p36
−272%
134
+272%
1440p15
−427%
79
+427%
4K17
−159%
44
+159%

1920x1080
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 17
−329%
73
+329%
Far Cry 5 30
−403%
151
+403%

1920x1080
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 13
−469%
74
+469%
Far Cry 5 28
−404%
141
+404%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−529%
176
+529%

1920x1080
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10
−530%
63
+530%
Far Cry 5 27
−393%
133
+393%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−421%
99
+421%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 11.74 58.83
Novelty 27 May 2019 30 July 2021
Memory bus width 64 128
Pipelines / CUDA cores 896 2048
Memory bandwidth 80 256
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 18 Watt 160 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

since it shows better performance.

Be aware that Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Quadro T500 Mobile by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro T500 Mobile from AMD is Radeon Pro 555, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 3 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon Pro 555 Radeon Pro 555
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro T500 Mobile:

Competitors of Radeon RX 6600 XT by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon RX 6600 XT's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce RTX 2070, which is faster by 3% and higher by 3 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 6600 XT:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


21 ratings
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
433 ratings
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.