Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	249	397
Place by popularity	not in top-100	16
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.71	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	N19P-Q3	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price	$2221	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	96
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	114.2	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Mobile and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.66
+93.1%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.70

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T2000 Mobile 13524
+102%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 6710

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by 102% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+106%

16−18

−106%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +86.4%	21−24 −86.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +100%	30−35 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +95.7%	21−24 −95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +106%	16−18 −106%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +67.7%	30−35 −67.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +90%	30−33 −90%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +81.1%	35−40 −81.1%
Hitman 3	45−50 +104%	24−27 −104%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +94.3%	35−40 −94.3%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +107%	30−33 −107%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +86.7%	30−33 −86.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +100%	30−33 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +111%	18−20 −111%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +86.4%	21−24 −86.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +100%	30−35 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +95.7%	21−24 −95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +106%	16−18 −106%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +67.7%	30−35 −67.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +90%	30−33 −90%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +81.1%	35−40 −81.1%
Hitman 3	45−50 +104%	24−27 −104%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +94.3%	35−40 −94.3%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +100%	30−35 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +86.7%	30−33 −86.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +100%	30−33 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +105%	21−24 −105%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +111%	18−20 −111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +86.4%	21−24 −86.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +114%	21−24 −114%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +106%	16−18 −106%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +67.7%	30−35 −67.7%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +81.1%	35−40 −81.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +94.3%	35−40 −94.3%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +107%	30−33 −107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +105%	21−24 −105%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +111%	18−20 −111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+107%

27−30

−107%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +122%	18−20 −122%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +100%	21−24 −100%
Hitman 3	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +106%	16−18 −106%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +100%	20−22 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +100%	21−24 −100%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +117%	18−20 −117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +105%	21−24 −105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	40−45 +95.2%	21−24 −95.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Hitman 3	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%