GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	291	258
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.08
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N19P-Q1	N18P-G62
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	no data	$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	1024
Core clock speed	795 / 1230 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 - 40 Watt	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	75.60	95.04

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T1000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.6	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.2.140
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Max-Q 17.38

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.14
+15.9%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro T1000 Max-Q by 16% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T1000 Max-Q 6726

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+15.9%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro T1000 Max-Q by 16% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50−55 −18%	59 +18%
1440p	35−40 −25.7%	44 +25.7%
4K	18−21 −33.3%	24 +33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

−119%

59
+119%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −69.4%	61 +69.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −63.3%	49 +63.3%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −42.4%	84 +42.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −57.8%	71 +57.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −70.4%	46 +70.4%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −48.9%	67 +48.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −40.4%	66 +40.4%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −13.1%	65−70 +13.1%
Hitman 3	45−50 −69.4%	83 +69.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −67.6%	62 +67.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −86.2%	54 +86.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −75.7%	65 +75.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −81.8%	60 +81.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −27.8%	46 +27.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −6.7%	32 +6.7%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −23.7%	73 +23.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −28.9%	58 +28.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −33.3%	36 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −37.8%	62 +37.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −31.9%	62 +31.9%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −13.1%	65−70 +13.1%
Hitman 3	45−50 −36.7%	67 +36.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −27%	47 +27%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −40.7%	38 +40.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +0%	29 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −43.2%	53 +43.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −94.6%	72 +94.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −57.6%	52 +57.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +33.3%	27 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +100%	15 −100%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −13.6%	67 +13.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −25.9%	34 +25.9%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −28.9%	58 +28.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −21.3%	57 +21.3%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −13.1%	65−70 +13.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −5.4%	39 +5.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +50%	22 −50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −42.3%	37 +42.3%
Hitman 3	27−30 −39.3%	39 +39.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −30.8%	17 +30.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −45.5%	32 +45.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −34.2%	51 +34.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −60%	16 +60%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −17.2%	30−35 +17.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −15.2%	35−40 +15.2%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −17.1%	40−45 +17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −58.3%	19 +58.3%
Hitman 3	16−18 −31.3%	21 +31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −63.6%	18 +63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −47.1%	25 +47.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −47.4%	28 +47.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6 +100%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −16.7%	27−30 +16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%

This is how T1000 Max-Q and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 18% faster than T1000 Max-Q in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 25.7% faster than T1000 Max-Q in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 33.3% faster than T1000 Max-Q in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 100% faster than the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 119% faster than the T1000 Max-Q.

All in all, in popular games: