RTX 4000 Mobile vs P5000 Mobile

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
0.66
 
1.42
Architecture
Turing
 
Pascal
GPU code name
N19E-Q3
 
N17E-Q5
Market segment
Mobile workstation
 
Mobile workstation
Launch date
27 May 2019 (1 year ago)
 
11 January 2017 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
 
$1,885
Price now
$2890
 
$2137

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
2560
 
2048
Core clock speed
1110 MHz
 
1164 MHz
Boost clock speed
1560 MHz
 
1506 MHz
Number of transistors
13,600 million
 
7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
 
16 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
110 Watt
 
100 Watt
Texture fill rate
249.6
 
202.5
Floating-point performance
no data
 
6,197 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and Quadro P5000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size
large
 
large
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
MXM-B (3.0)

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
GDDR6
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
 
16 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
 
6006 MHz
Memory bandwidth
448.0 GB/s
 
192 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
 
No outputs
Display Port
no data
 
1.4
G-SYNC support
+
 
-

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus
-
 
+
3D Stereo
no data
 
+
Mosaic
no data
 
+
VR Ready
+
 
no data
nView Display Management
no data
 
+
Optimus
no data
 
+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_1)
 
12
Shader Model
6.5
 
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
 
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
 
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
 
6.1

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Mobile 50.40
P5000 Mobile 80.34 +59.4%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4000 Mobile 445161 +10.9%
P5000 Mobile 401246

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4000 Mobile 119052 +37.3%
P5000 Mobile 86679

3DMark Fire Strike Score

RTX 4000 Mobile 16903 +36.7%
P5000 Mobile 12363

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4000 Mobile 18849 +28.5%
P5000 Mobile 14666

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4000 Mobile 25371 +26.2%
P5000 Mobile 20096

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4000 Mobile 56250 +25.9%
P5000 Mobile 44689

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

RTX 4000 Mobile 149
P5000 Mobile 159 +6.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

RTX 4000 Mobile 186 +10.7%
P5000 Mobile 168

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

RTX 4000 Mobile 98 +46.3%
P5000 Mobile 67

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

RTX 4000 Mobile 62
P5000 Mobile 65 +4.8%

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

RTX 4000 Mobile 144 +45.5%
P5000 Mobile 99

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

RTX 4000 Mobile 141 +11.9%
P5000 Mobile 126

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

RTX 4000 Mobile 162 +8%
P5000 Mobile 150

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 Mobile 13334 +15.3%
P5000 Mobile 11561

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

RTX 4000 Mobile satisfies 100% minimum and 98% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
100%
Recommended
98%
Minimum
100%
Recommended
98%

P5000 Mobile satisfies 100% minimum and 100% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
100%
Recommended
100%
Minimum
100%
Recommended
100%

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

 
RTX 4000 Mobile
P5000 Mobile
1080p
 
107
no data
1440p
 
63
no data
4K
 
44
no data

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Much newer (27 May 2019 vs 11 January 2017)

More pipelines (2560 vs 2048)

Higher memory bandwidth (448 vs 192 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 16 nm)

DLSS

Raytracing

VR Ready

G-SYNC (removes screen tearing by telling the display when to renew the image. Only works with G-SYNC compatible displays)

Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile

59.4% faster (about 1.5 times) in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($2137 vs $2890)

Lower power consumption (100W vs 110W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)

PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile, since it shows better performance.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.