P5000 Mobile vs RTX 5000 Max-Q

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
1.38
 
0.81
Architecture
Pascal
 
Turing
GPU code name
N17E-Q5
 
N19E-Q5 MAX-Q
Market segment
Mobile workstation
 
Mobile workstation
Launch date
11 January 2017 (4 years ago)
 
27 May 2019 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,885
 
no data
Price now
$2137
 
$2130

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
2048
 
3072
Core clock speed
1164 MHz
 
600 - 930 MHz
Boost clock
1506 MHz
 
1350 - 1455 MHz
Transistor count
7,200 million
 
13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
 
12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
100 Watt
 
80 Watt
Texture fill rate
202.5
 
259.2
Floating-point performance
6,197 gflops
 
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro P5000 Mobile and Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size
large
 
large
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
no data
 
None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
16 GB
 
16 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6006 MHz
 
14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192 GB/s
 
448.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
 
No outputs
Display Port
1.4
 
no data
G-SYNC support
-
 
+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus
+
 
-
3D Stereo
+
 
no data
Mosaic
+
 
no data
VR Ready
no data
 
+
nView Display Management
+
 
no data
Optimus
+
 
no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12
 
12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
 
6.5
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
 
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
 
7.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5000 Mobile 31.55 +71.5%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 18.40

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

P5000 Mobile 401246
RTX 5000 Max-Q 433183 +8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P5000 Mobile 86679 +33.8%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 64768

3DMark Fire Strike Score

P5000 Mobile 12363
RTX 5000 Max-Q 16601 +34.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P5000 Mobile 14666
RTX 5000 Max-Q 19790 +34.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P5000 Mobile 20096
RTX 5000 Max-Q 26465 +31.7%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

P5000 Mobile 44689
RTX 5000 Max-Q 53221 +19.1%

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

P5000 Mobile 159 +28.2%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 124

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

P5000 Mobile 159 +29.3%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 123

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

P5000 Mobile 168 +12%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 150

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

P5000 Mobile 168 +21.7%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 138

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

P5000 Mobile 67
RTX 5000 Max-Q 97 +44.8%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

P5000 Mobile 67
RTX 5000 Max-Q 97 +44.8%

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

P5000 Mobile 65 +1.6%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 64

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

P5000 Mobile 65 +3.2%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 63

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

P5000 Mobile 99 +13.8%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 87

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

P5000 Mobile 99 +20.7%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 82

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

P5000 Mobile 14.5 +1.4%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 14.3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

P5000 Mobile 14.5 +1.4%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 14.3

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

P5000 Mobile 126 +0.8%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 125

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

P5000 Mobile 126 +0.8%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 125

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

P5000 Mobile 150 +20%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 125

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

P5000 Mobile 150 +21%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 124

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

P5000 Mobile 125
RTX 5000 Max-Q 184 +47.2%

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5000 Mobile 11561
RTX 5000 Max-Q 14386 +24.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile

71.5% faster (about 1.5 times) in synthetic tests

Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)

PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Much newer (27 May 2019 vs 11 January 2017)

Cheaper ($2130 vs $2137)

More pipelines (3072 vs 2048)

Higher memory bandwidth (448 vs 192 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 16 nm)

Lower power consumption (80 vs 100 watts)

DLSS

Raytracing

VR Ready

G-SYNC (removes screen tearing by telling the display when to renew the image. Only works with G-SYNC compatible displays)

Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

So, Quadro P5000 Mobile or RTX 5000 Max-Q?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile, since it shows better performance.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.