P3000 Mobile vs RTX 4000 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

RTX 4000 Mobile
32.58
+69.7%

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 70% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking156269
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money7.189.96
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN19E-Q3N17E-Q1
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years old)11 January 2017 (7 years old)
Current price$2890 $537
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P3000 Mobile has 39% better value for money than RTX 4000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601280
Core clock speed1110 MHz1088 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate249.697.20
Floating-point performanceno data3,110 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and Quadro P3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s168 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.4
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.56.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Mobile 32.58
+69.7%
P3000 Mobile 19.20

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 70% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4000 Mobile 56250
+68.5%
P3000 Mobile 33390

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 68% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4000 Mobile 25371
+110%
P3000 Mobile 12105

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 110% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Mobile 18849
+104%
P3000 Mobile 9256

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 104% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Mobile 119052
+88%
P3000 Mobile 63332

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 88% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RTX 4000 Mobile 445161
+34.1%
P3000 Mobile 331998

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 34% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4000 Mobile 98
+78.8%
P3000 Mobile 55

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 79% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4000 Mobile 144
+113%
P3000 Mobile 68

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 113% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4000 Mobile 162
+67.8%
P3000 Mobile 97

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 68% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4000 Mobile 149
+39%
P3000 Mobile 107

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 39% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4000 Mobile 186
+154%
P3000 Mobile 73

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 154% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4000 Mobile 141
+61.7%
P3000 Mobile 87

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 62% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 4000 Mobile 62
+109%
P3000 Mobile 30

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P3000 Mobile by 109% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108
+68.8%
64
−68.8%
1440p63
+80%
35−40
−80%
4K47
+67.9%
28
−67.9%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 87
+123%
35−40
−123%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+72.7%
30−35
−72.7%
Battlefield 5 101
+55.4%
65−70
−55.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+76%
50−55
−76%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Far Cry 5 106
+112%
50−55
−112%
Far Cry New Dawn 103
+98.1%
50−55
−98.1%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+57.6%
65−70
−57.6%
Hitman 3 100−110
+85.5%
55−60
−85.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+70.7%
40−45
−70.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+62.5%
30−35
−62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 105
+156%
40−45
−156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+67.6%
35−40
−67.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75
+92.3%
35−40
−92.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+72.7%
30−35
−72.7%
Battlefield 5 87
+33.8%
65−70
−33.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+76%
50−55
−76%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Far Cry 5 100
+100%
50−55
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 101
+94.2%
50−55
−94.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+57.6%
65−70
−57.6%
Hitman 3 100−110
+85.5%
55−60
−85.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+70.7%
40−45
−70.7%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+83.9%
30−35
−83.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+62.5%
30−35
−62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
+102%
40−45
−102%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+127%
63
−127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+67.6%
35−40
−67.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
+38.5%
35−40
−38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+72.7%
30−35
−72.7%
Battlefield 5 81
+24.6%
65−70
−24.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Far Cry 5 96
+92%
50−55
−92%
Far Cry New Dawn 91
+75%
50−55
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+57.6%
65−70
−57.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+127%
33
−127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+67.6%
35−40
−67.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+79.3%
27−30
−79.3%
Hitman 3 55−60
+87.1%
30−35
−87.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+69.2%
24−27
−69.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+128%
24−27
−128%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+105%
20−22
−105%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%
Battlefield 5 66
+57.1%
40−45
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%
Far Cry 5 69
+116%
30−35
−116%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+108%
35−40
−108%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+74.4%
35−40
−74.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Hitman 3 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+131%
12−14
−131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+132%
22
−132%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+133%
12−14
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Battlefield 5 42
+90.9%
21−24
−90.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 36
+140%
14−16
−140%
Far Cry New Dawn 43
+139%
18−20
−139%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and P3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 68.8% faster than P3000 Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 80% faster than P3000 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 67.9% faster than P3000 Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4000 Mobile is 156% faster than the P3000 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4000 Mobile surpassed P3000 Mobile in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 32.58 19.20
Recency 27 May 2019 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 75 Watt

The Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 26 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 123 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.