Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs RTX 4000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	156	161
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	7.25	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	N19E-Q3	GP104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price	$2890	no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2560
Core clock speed	1110 MHz	1316 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1569 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	249.6	251.0

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and Quadro P5200 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	7216 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	230.9 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Mobile 32.65
+2.3%

P5200 Max-Q 31.91

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P5200 Max-Q by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4000 Mobile 12640
+2.3%

P5200 Max-Q 12355

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms P5200 Max-Q by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	108 +8%	100−110 −8%
1440p	63 +5%	60−65 −5%
4K	47 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
+12%

50−55

−12%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	87 +2.4%	85−90 −2.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%
Battlefield 5	101 +6.3%	95−100 −6.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +12%	50−55 −12%
Far Cry 5	106 +6%	100−105 −6%
Far Cry New Dawn	103 +3%	100−105 −3%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +4%	100−105 −4%
Hitman 3	100−110 +7.4%	95−100 −7.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +7.7%	65−70 −7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +6%	50−55 −6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	105 +5%	100−105 −5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75 +7.1%	70−75 −7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%
Battlefield 5	87 +2.4%	85−90 −2.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +12%	50−55 −12%
Far Cry 5	100 +5.3%	95−100 −5.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	101 +6.3%	95−100 −6.3%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +4%	100−105 −4%
Hitman 3	100−110 +7.4%	95−100 −7.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +7.7%	65−70 −7.7%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +6%	50−55 −6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	83 +3.8%	80−85 −3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	143 +10%	130−140 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	54 +8%	50−55 −8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%
Battlefield 5	81 +8%	75−80 −8%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +12%	50−55 −12%
Far Cry 5	96 +6.7%	90−95 −6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	91 +7.1%	85−90 −7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +4%	100−105 −4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75 +7.1%	70−75 −7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +4%	50−55 −4%
Hitman 3	55−60 +5.5%	55−60 −5.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41 +2.5%	40−45 −2.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
Battlefield 5	66 +10%	60−65 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +14.3%	21−24 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	69 +6.2%	65−70 −6.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	77 +2.7%	75−80 −2.7%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Hitman 3	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 +13.3%	45−50 −13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	28 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Battlefield 5	42 +5%	40−45 −5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	36 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	43 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +15%	40−45 −15%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and P5200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 Mobile is 8% faster than P5200 Max-Q in 1080p
RTX 4000 Mobile is 5% faster than P5200 Max-Q in 1440p
RTX 4000 Mobile is 4.4% faster than P5200 Max-Q in 4K

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	32.65	31.91
Recency	27 May 2019	21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	100 Watt