AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

RTX 4000 Max-Q
33.01
+113%

Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 113% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking151318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data3.64
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameN19E-Q3 MAX-QNavi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years old)13 November 2019 (4 years old)
Current priceno data$2068
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601280
Core clock speed780 - 960 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1380 - 1485 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 - 90 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate220.8100.0

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 33.01
+113%
Pro 5300M 15.47

Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 113% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4000 Max-Q 12794
+113%
Pro 5300M 5996

Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 113% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD89
+123%
40−45
−123%
1440p46
+119%
21−24
−119%
4K48
+129%
21−24
−129%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+90.6%
30−35
−90.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+123%
24−27
−123%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+90.6%
50−55
−90.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+123%
40−45
−123%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+97.6%
40−45
−97.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+94.4%
50−55
−94.4%
Hitman 3 100−110
+140%
40−45
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+115%
30−35
−115%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+104%
24−27
−104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+141%
30−35
−141%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+114%
27−30
−114%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+90.6%
30−35
−90.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+123%
24−27
−123%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+90.6%
50−55
−90.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+123%
40−45
−123%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+97.6%
40−45
−97.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+94.4%
50−55
−94.4%
Hitman 3 100−110
+140%
40−45
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+115%
30−35
−115%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+142%
24−27
−142%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+104%
24−27
−104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+141%
30−35
−141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
+248%
30−35
−248%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+114%
27−30
−114%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+90.6%
30−35
−90.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+123%
24−27
−123%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+90.6%
50−55
−90.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+97.6%
40−45
−97.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+94.4%
50−55
−94.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+90.9%
30−35
−90.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+114%
27−30
−114%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+130%
21−24
−130%
Hitman 3 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+136%
10−12
−136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+135%
20−22
−135%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+125%
16−18
−125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+118%
30−35
−118%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+136%
24−27
−136%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+117%
27−30
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+175%
16−18
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Hitman 3 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+140%
14−16
−140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+135%
16−18
−135%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+120%
14−16
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%

This is how RTX 4000 Max-Q and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is 123% faster than Pro 5300M

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is 119% faster than Pro 5300M

4K resolution:

  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is 129% faster than Pro 5300M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4000 Max-Q is 248% faster than the Pro 5300M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4000 Max-Q surpassed Pro 5300M in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 33.01 15.47
Recency 27 May 2019 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 13 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 158 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.