Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile with GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3000 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
25.41
+112%

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by a whopping 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking219406
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.70no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU106no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304768
Core clock speed945 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate198.7no data
Floating-point processing power6.359 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB3 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi-Projectionno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 25.41
+112%
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.01

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+132%
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+129%
45−50
−129%
4K88
+120%
40−45
−120%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+129%
35−40
−129%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+113%
55−60
−113%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Metro Exodus 91
+128%
40−45
−128%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
Valorant 100−110
+133%
45−50
−133%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+129%
35−40
−129%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Dota 2 44
+144%
18−20
−144%
Far Cry 5 86
+115%
40−45
−115%
Fortnite 130−140
+117%
60−65
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+113%
55−60
−113%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+123%
40−45
−123%
Metro Exodus 43
+139%
18−20
−139%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110
+120%
50−55
−120%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+115%
40−45
−115%
Valorant 100−110
+133%
45−50
−133%
World of Tanks 260−270
+119%
120−130
−119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+129%
35−40
−129%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Dota 2 121
+120%
55−60
−120%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+126%
35−40
−126%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+113%
55−60
−113%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+116%
75−80
−116%
Valorant 100−110
+133%
45−50
−133%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Dota 2 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+119%
80−85
−119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
World of Tanks 170−180
+116%
80−85
−116%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+121%
24−27
−121%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+123%
35−40
−123%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+137%
30−33
−137%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Valorant 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Dota 2 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Dota 2 88
+120%
40−45
−120%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Fortnite 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Valorant 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 129% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 120% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.41 12.01
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 3 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm

RTX 3000 Mobile has a 111.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 319 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 125 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.