Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Radeon RX 5300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5300M and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5300M
2019
3 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
12.87
+3.4%

RX 5300M outperforms Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking393401
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.44no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 14no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408768
Core clock speed1000 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1445 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data
Texture fill rate127.2no data
Floating-point processing power4.069 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs88no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB3 MB
Memory bus width96 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Multi-Projectionno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5300M 12.87
+3.4%
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.45

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5300M 10306
+61%
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+10%
60−65
−10%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 69
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%
Valorant 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Dota 2 76
+8.6%
70−75
−8.6%
Far Cry 5 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Fortnite 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 46
+15%
40−45
−15%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Valorant 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
World of Tanks 170−180
+8.8%
160−170
−8.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 49
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Dota 2 95
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%
Valorant 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
World of Tanks 90−95
+7.1%
85−90
−7.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Valorant 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Dota 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Fortnite 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

This is how RX 5300M and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 5300M is 11% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.87 12.45
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 3 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm

RX 5300M has a 3.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 5300M and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 96 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 124 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.