Radeon Vega 11 Embedded vs Tesla K80

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking351not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.48no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK210Raven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date17 November 2014 (10 years ago)13 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496704
Core clock speed562 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors7,100 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate171.457.20
Floating-point processing power4.113 TFLOPS1.83 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs20844

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth240.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.7-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 13 February 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 35 Watt

Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 757.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80 and Radeon Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K80 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K80
Tesla K80
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon Vega 11 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 183 votes

Rate Tesla K80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 18 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.