Tesla T4 vs Quadro P620

Place in the ranking	474	208
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	16.33	27.41
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	TU104
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 February 2018 (7 years ago)	13 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2560
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	585 MHz
Boost clock speed	1443 MHz	1590 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	46.18	254.4
Floating-point processing power	1.478 TFLOPS	8.141 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	32	160
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	168 mm
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	320.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P620 9.30

Tesla T4 27.32
+194%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3660

Tesla T4 10750
+194%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P620 12084

Tesla T4 61276
+407%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Quadro P620 11727

Tesla T4 70627
+502%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−177%

130−140
+177%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −193%	85−90 +193%
Fortnite	113 −165%	300−310 +165%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −181%	90−95 +181%
Valorant	85−90 −187%	250−260 +187%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	130−140 −192%	400−450 +192%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Dota 2	90 −189%	260−270 +189%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −193%	85−90 +193%
Fortnite	42 −186%	120−130 +186%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −179%	95−100 +179%
Metro Exodus	17 −165%	45−50 +165%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −181%	90−95 +181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 −181%	90−95 +181%
Valorant	85−90 −187%	250−260 +187%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Dota 2	83 −189%	240−250 +189%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −193%	85−90 +193%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −181%	90−95 +181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −165%	45−50 +165%
Valorant	85−90 −187%	250−260 +187%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

−193%

85−90
+193%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	65−70 −179%	190−200 +179%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −189%	130−140 +189%
Valorant	100−105 −190%	290−300 +190%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −186%	60−65 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −186%	60−65 +186%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

18−20

−189%

55−60
+189%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Valorant	45−50 −183%	130−140 +183%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Dota 2	30−35 −188%	95−100 +188%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

8−9
−163%

21−24

+163%

This is how Quadro P620 and Tesla T4 compete in popular games:

Tesla T4 is 177% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.30	27.32
Recency	1 February 2018	13 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	70 Watt

Quadro P620 has 75% lower power consumption.

Tesla T4, on the other hand, has a 193.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla T4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.