Tesla T4 vs Quadro P3200

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 with Tesla T4, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P3200
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
19.42

Tesla T4 outperforms P3200 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking265218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.5327.08
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)13 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speed1328 MHz585 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate172.8254.4
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS8.141 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P3200 19.42
Tesla T4 23.91
+23.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P3200 8676
Tesla T4 10683
+23.1%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P3200 34271
Tesla T4 61276
+78.8%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P3200 27741
Tesla T4 70627
+155%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD84
−19%
100−110
+19%
4K28
−7.1%
30−35
+7.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−23%
150−160
+23%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−23%
150−160
+23%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Far Cry 5 79
−20.3%
95−100
+20.3%
Fortnite 100−110
−19.3%
130−140
+19.3%
Forza Horizon 4 95
−15.8%
110−120
+15.8%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−19.4%
80−85
+19.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−17.3%
95−100
+17.3%
Valorant 150−160
−18.4%
180−190
+18.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−23%
150−160
+23%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−19.8%
290−300
+19.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Dota 2 119
−17.6%
140−150
+17.6%
Far Cry 5 74
−21.6%
90−95
+21.6%
Fortnite 100−110
−19.3%
130−140
+19.3%
Forza Horizon 4 88
−13.6%
100−105
+13.6%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−19.4%
80−85
+19.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−21.8%
95−100
+21.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−17.3%
95−100
+17.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
−19%
100−105
+19%
Valorant 150−160
−18.4%
180−190
+18.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Dota 2 112
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Far Cry 5 70
−21.4%
85−90
+21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 72
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−17.3%
95−100
+17.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Valorant 150−160
−18.4%
180−190
+18.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−19.3%
130−140
+19.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−19.2%
180−190
+19.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−21.6%
45−50
+21.6%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−21.4%
210−220
+21.4%
Valorant 190−200
−20.4%
230−240
+20.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−16.7%
70−75
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−20.4%
65−70
+20.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Valorant 120−130
−23%
150−160
+23%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 70−75
−19.7%
85−90
+19.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−21.6%
45−50
+21.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%

This is how Quadro P3200 and Tesla T4 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla T4 is 19% faster in 1080p
  • Tesla T4 is 7% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.42 23.91
Recency 21 February 2018 13 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 70 Watt

Tesla T4 has a 23.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

The Tesla T4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while Tesla T4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
NVIDIA Tesla T4
Tesla T4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 313 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 242 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 or Tesla T4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.