NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs GeForce GTX 1660
Comparison of Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 1660 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 1660's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 1660's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
43.33 GTexel / s
157.1 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 1660 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 1660: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
80.13 GB / s
192.1 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 1660.
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 1660. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 1660, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 1660. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Quadro P620 19.11
GTX 1660 57.35 +200.1%
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Quadro P620 310112
GTX 1660 478810 +54.4%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Quadro P620 31073
GTX 1660 79435 +155.6%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Quadro P620 4493
GTX 1660 12629 +181.1%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Quadro P620 4745
GTX 1660 13847 +191.8%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Quadro P620 5984
GTX 1660 20696 +245.9%
3DMark Vantage Performance
Quadro P620 25105
GTX 1660 57895 +130.6%
Quadro P620 3807
GTX 1660 10816 +184.1%
Let's see how good Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 1660 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P620
Less power hungry (40 vs 120 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
200.1% faster (about 3 times) in synthetic tests
Much newer (14 March 2019 vs 1 February 2018)
Wider memory bus (192 vs 128 bit)
More pipelines (1408 vs 512)
Higher memory bandwidth (192.1 vs 80.13 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 14 nm)
So, Quadro P620 or GTX 1660?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660.
Be aware that Quadro P620 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro P620 and GeForce GTX 1660, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.