RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P620

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 with RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
9.49

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms P620 by a whopping 438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46855
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.3730.60
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107no data
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5125120
Core clock speed1177 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1443 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate46.18no data
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.49
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 51.01
+438%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3650
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19613
+437%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P620 5909
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 41630
+605%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P620 4673
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 29248
+526%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro P620 1388
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 12806
+823%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
−421%
250−260
+421%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Elden Ring 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−416%
160−170
+416%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−426%
200−210
+426%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%
Valorant 35−40
−414%
180−190
+414%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−416%
160−170
+416%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Dota 2 30
−433%
160−170
+433%
Elden Ring 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%
Far Cry 5 64
−369%
300−310
+369%
Fortnite 55−60
−436%
300−310
+436%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−426%
200−210
+426%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−429%
180−190
+429%
Metro Exodus 6
−400%
30−33
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 125
−420%
650−700
+420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−417%
150−160
+417%
Valorant 35−40
−414%
180−190
+414%
World of Tanks 130−140
−407%
700−750
+407%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−416%
160−170
+416%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Dota 2 83
−382%
400−450
+382%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−413%
200−210
+413%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−426%
200−210
+426%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−373%
350−400
+373%
Valorant 35−40
−414%
180−190
+414%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Elden Ring 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−422%
240−250
+422%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
World of Tanks 65−70
−415%
350−400
+415%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−429%
90−95
+429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Dota 2 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Elden Ring 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−436%
150−160
+436%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Dota 2 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Fortnite 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Valorant 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%

This is how Quadro P620 and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 421% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.49 51.01
Recency 1 February 2018 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 115 Watt

Quadro P620 has 187.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 437.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 636 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 8 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.