RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
52.59
+12.8%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6081
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency36.2735.36
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD104AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores74245120
Core clock speed1290 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate386.3247.2
Floating-point processing power24.72 TFLOPS15.82 TFLOPS
ROPs8064
TMUs232160
Tensor Cores232160
Ray Tracing Cores5840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.9
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 52.59
+12.8%
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 46.61

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 22283
+12.8%
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19751

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 54921
+31.9%
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 41630

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 40179
+37.4%
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 29248

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 16308
+27.3%
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 12806

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.59 46.61
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 100 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 12.8% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has 10% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 31 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 11 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile or RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.