RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 Max-Q and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P2000 Max-Q
2017
4 GB GDDR5
13.18

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms P2000 Max-Q by a whopping 270% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38057
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.62
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107GLno data
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date5 July 2017 (7 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685120
Core clock speed1215 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1468 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz16000 MHz
Shared memory--

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Max-Q 13.18
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 48.83
+270%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P2000 Max-Q 5309
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19667
+270%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P2000 Max-Q 8148
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 41630
+411%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P2000 Max-Q 6742
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 29248
+334%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

P2000 Max-Q 2049
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 12806
+525%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
−260%
180−190
+260%
4K22
−264%
80−85
+264%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−256%
160−170
+256%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−257%
200−210
+257%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−268%
140−150
+268%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%
Valorant 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−256%
160−170
+256%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Dota 2 50−55
−260%
180−190
+260%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−265%
190−200
+265%
Fortnite 75−80
−259%
280−290
+259%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−257%
200−210
+257%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−260%
180−190
+260%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−268%
140−150
+268%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−247%
350−400
+247%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−257%
150−160
+257%
Valorant 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
World of Tanks 180−190
−255%
650−700
+255%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−256%
160−170
+256%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Dota 2 50−55
−260%
180−190
+260%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−265%
190−200
+265%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−257%
200−210
+257%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−247%
350−400
+247%
Valorant 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−233%
350−400
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
World of Tanks 95−100
−261%
350−400
+261%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Valorant 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Dota 2 24−27
−260%
90−95
+260%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−266%
150−160
+266%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Dota 2 24−27
−260%
90−95
+260%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Fortnite 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−268%
70−75
+268%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Valorant 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%

This is how P2000 Max-Q and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 260% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 264% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.18 48.83
Recency 5 July 2017 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 270.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Max-Q in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 9 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.