RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P620

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 with RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
9.42

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms P620 by a whopping 534% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.3127.57
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5127424
Core clock speed1177 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1443 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate46.18no data
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.42
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.72
+534%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3636
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 23046
+534%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
−530%
290−300
+530%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−533%
95−100
+533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−521%
180−190
+521%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−533%
95−100
+533%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−456%
350−400
+456%
Hitman 3 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−477%
300−310
+477%
Metro Exodus 35
−529%
220−230
+529%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
−445%
300−310
+445%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−474%
350−400
+474%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−521%
180−190
+521%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−533%
95−100
+533%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−456%
350−400
+456%
Hitman 3 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−477%
300−310
+477%
Metro Exodus 28
−507%
170−180
+507%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−513%
190−200
+513%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−474%
350−400
+474%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−532%
120−130
+532%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−533%
95−100
+533%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−456%
350−400
+456%
Hitman 3 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−477%
300−310
+477%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−513%
190−200
+513%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−488%
100−105
+488%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−474%
350−400
+474%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−510%
250−260
+510%
Hitman 3 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−483%
350−400
+483%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Hitman 3 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−515%
240−250
+515%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%

This is how Quadro P620 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 530% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.42 59.72
Recency 1 February 2018 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro P620 has 275% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 534% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 607 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.