NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs GeForce GTX 1660
Comparison of Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660.
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
APIs supported by Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Quadro P5200 42.54
GTX 1660 52.59 +23.6%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Quadro P5200 106328 +33.9%
GTX 1660 79435
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Quadro P5200 16626 +31.6%
GTX 1660 12629
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Quadro P5200 18467 +33.4%
GTX 1660 13847
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Quadro P5200 25100 +21.3%
GTX 1660 20696
3DMark Vantage Performance
Quadro P5200 65844 +13.7%
GTX 1660 57895
Quadro P5200 9185
GTX 1660 11354 +23.6%
Let's see how good Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Wider memory bus (256 vs 192 bit)
More pipelines (2048 vs 1408)
Less power hungry (100 vs 120 watts)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Pro
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
23.6% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (14 March 2019 vs 11 January 2017)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 16 nm)
So, Quadro P5200 or GTX 1660?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660.
Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.