Quadro T2000 Mobile vs P620

Place in performance ranking	435	247
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	20.74	4.69
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GP107	N19P-Q3
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$170	$2221

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P620 has 342% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1024
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1442 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.33	114.2
Floating-point performance	1,490 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro P620 and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.13 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.36

T2000 Mobile 20.62
+120%

T2000 Mobile outperforms P620 by 120% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P620 3625

T2000 Mobile 7985
+120%

T2000 Mobile outperforms P620 by 120% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P620 5909

T2000 Mobile 13524
+129%

T2000 Mobile outperforms P620 by 129% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−108%

100−110
+108%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−120%

30−35
+120%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −110%	40−45 +110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −157%	35−40 +157%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −116%	65−70 +116%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −116%	50−55 +116%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −120%	30−35 +120%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −135%	50−55 +135%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −115%	70−75 +115%
Hitman 3	24−27 −150%	60−65 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −132%	40−45 +132%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −113%	30−35 +113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 −175%	40−45 +175%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −110%	40−45 +110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −157%	35−40 +157%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −116%	65−70 +116%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −116%	50−55 +116%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −120%	30−35 +120%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −135%	50−55 +135%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −115%	70−75 +115%
Hitman 3	24−27 −150%	60−65 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −132%	40−45 +132%
Metro Exodus	17 −94.1%	30−35 +94.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −113%	30−35 +113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	13 −238%	40−45 +238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −110%	40−45 +110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −157%	35−40 +157%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −116%	65−70 +116%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −120%	30−35 +120%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −135%	50−55 +135%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −115%	70−75 +115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −165%	45−50 +165%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −121%	30−35 +121%
Hitman 3	14−16 −120%	30−35 +120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −186%	20−22 +186%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −280%	18−20 +280%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −207%	45−50 +207%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −147%	40−45 +147%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −156%	21−24 +156%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
Hitman 3	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −100%	20−22 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −164%	27−30 +164%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%