Quadro M5000M vs P4200 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	176	287
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	8.07
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	GP104	GM204
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price	no data	$468

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1,536
Core clock speed	no data	962 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1051 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	213.1	93.60
Floating-point performance	no data	2,995 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P4200 Max-Q and Quadro M5000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.4 GB/s	160 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.7 (6.4)	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	+
CUDA	6.1	5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P4200 Max-Q 29.64
+65.1%

M5000M 17.95

P4200 Max-Q outperforms M5000M by 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

P4200 Max-Q 11446
+65.1%

M5000M 6932

P4200 Max-Q outperforms M5000M by 65% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

120−130
+53.8%

−53.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50
+60.7%

27−30

−60.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +61%	55−60 −61%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +60.7%	27−30 −60.7%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +54.8%	40−45 −54.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +56.3%	45−50 −56.3%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +56.6%	80−85 −56.6%
Hitman 3	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +54.9%	70−75 −54.9%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +58.3%	60−65 −58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +63.3%	45−50 −63.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +57.9%	55−60 −57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +63.6%	55−60 −63.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +61%	55−60 −61%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +60.7%	27−30 −60.7%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +54.8%	40−45 −54.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +56.3%	45−50 −56.3%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +56.6%	80−85 −56.6%
Hitman 3	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +54.9%	70−75 −54.9%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +58.3%	60−65 −58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +63.3%	45−50 −63.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +57.9%	55−60 −57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +64.2%	67 −64.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +63.6%	55−60 −63.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +60.7%	27−30 −60.7%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +54.8%	40−45 −54.8%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +56.6%	80−85 −56.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +54.9%	70−75 −54.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +57.9%	55−60 −57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +57.9%	38 −57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +63.6%	55−60 −63.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
+63.3%

45−50

−63.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +61.8%	30−35 −61.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +52.2%	21−24 −52.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
Hitman 3	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +51.5%	30−35 −51.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +50%	20−22 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
+55.2%

27−30

−55.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +50%	20−22 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +50%	20−22 −50%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +58.8%	16−18 −58.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%