Quadro P2200 vs P3200

Place in performance ranking	222	210
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	3.59	32.23
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	N18E-Q1	GP106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 February 2017 (7 years ago)	10 June 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$2122	$409

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P2200 has 798% better value for money than Quadro P3200.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	1280
Core clock speed	708 - 1202 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1228 MHz	1493 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	78 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	172.8	119.4

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro P3200 and Quadro P2200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	201 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	5 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	10008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168.3 GB/s	200.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 23.04

Quadro P2200 24.08
+4.5%

P2200 outperforms P3200 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P3200 8919

Quadro P2200 9324
+4.5%

P2200 outperforms P3200 by 5% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P3200 32521
+3.3%

Quadro P2200 31480

P3200 outperforms P2200 by 3% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro P3200 35816
+15.5%

Quadro P2200 31016

P3200 outperforms P2200 by 15% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P3200 27741

Quadro P2200 29989
+8.1%

P2200 outperforms P3200 by 8% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	85 +0%	85−90 +0%
4K	28 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40
+5.7%

35−40

−5.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65 +0%	65−70 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +1.3%	75−80 −1.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Far Cry 5	79 −1.3%	80−85 +1.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
Forza Horizon 4	95 +0%	95−100 +0%
Hitman 3	65−70 −2.9%	70−75 +2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −2%	50−55 +2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 −3.2%	65−70 +3.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +1.3%	75−80 −1.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Far Cry 5	74 −1.4%	75−80 +1.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
Forza Horizon 4	88 −2.3%	90−95 +2.3%
Hitman 3	65−70 −2.9%	70−75 +2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −2%	50−55 +2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	53 −3.8%	55−60 +3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	84 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +0%	40−45 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +1.3%	75−80 −1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Far Cry 5	70 +0%	70−75 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +1.7%	60−65 −1.7%
Forza Horizon 4	72 −4.2%	75−80 +4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Hitman 3	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +2%	50−55 −2%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Hitman 3	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%