To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
P2200 vs P5200 Max-Q
Price now
no data
Games supported
96%
- Interface MXM-B (3.0)
- Core clock speed 1316 MHz
- Max video memory 16 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 7216 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1000 MHz
- Max video memory 5 GB
- Memory type GDDR5X
- Memory clock speed 10008 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Price now
972$
Games supported
87%
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | 113 | 160 |
| Value for money | no data | 8.97 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | GP106 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (4 years old) | 10 June 2019 (3 years old) |
| Current price | no data | $972 |
Value for money
no data
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 251.0 | 119.4 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 201 mm |
| Width | MXM Module | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7216 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 230.9 GB/s | 200.2 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 6.1 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Quadro P5200 Max-Q outperforms Quadro P2200 by 34% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 32.19 | 23.95 |
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 10 June 2019 |
| Memory bus width | 256 | 160 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 1280 |
| Memory bandwidth | 230.9 | 200.2 |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
since it shows better performance.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Quadro P5200 Max-Q by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro P5200 Max-Q from AMD is Radeon Pro 5700 XT, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro P5200 Max-Q:
Competitors of Quadro P2200 by AMD
According to our data, the nearest equivalent to Quadro P2200 by AMD is Radeon Pro W5500, which is slower by 3% and lower by 11 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro P2200:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
