Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	345	310
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.45	30.98
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP106	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	15 February 2019 (5 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	1024
Core clock speed	1291 MHz	1200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1291 MHz	1620 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.95	103.7
Floating-point processing power	2.974 TFLOPS	3.318 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	3.75 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Mobile 15.71

T2000 Max-Q 17.96
+14.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P2000 Mobile 8387

T2000 Max-Q 11461
+36.7%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

P2000 Mobile 32964

T2000 Max-Q 39269
+19.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P2000 Mobile 6847

T2000 Max-Q 8262
+20.7%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P2000 Mobile 43566
+6%

T2000 Max-Q 41106

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

P2000 Mobile 350317
+366%

T2000 Max-Q 75193

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

P2000 Mobile 2046

T2000 Max-Q 3094
+51.2%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

P2000 Mobile 60
+17.9%

T2000 Max-Q 51

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

P2000 Mobile 104
+6.7%

T2000 Max-Q 97

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

P2000 Mobile 67

T2000 Max-Q 75
+11.8%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

P2000 Mobile 70

T2000 Max-Q 91
+28.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

P2000 Mobile 65

T2000 Max-Q 89
+36.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

P2000 Mobile 23

T2000 Max-Q 32
+39.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

P2000 Mobile 31

T2000 Max-Q 40
+31.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

P2000 Mobile 5

T2000 Max-Q 7
+31.5%

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

P2000 Mobile 31

T2000 Max-Q 40
+31.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

P2000 Mobile 60
+17.8%

T2000 Max-Q 51

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

P2000 Mobile 70

T2000 Max-Q 91
+28.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

P2000 Mobile 104
+6.7%

T2000 Max-Q 97

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

P2000 Mobile 67

T2000 Max-Q 75
+11.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

P2000 Mobile 65

T2000 Max-Q 89
+36.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

P2000 Mobile 23

T2000 Max-Q 32
+39.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

P2000 Mobile 5.4

T2000 Max-Q 7.1
+31.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −26.7%	57 +26.7%
1440p	21−24 −23.8%	26 +23.8%
4K	30−35 −23.3%	37 +23.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Elden Ring	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Metro Exodus	58 +0%	58 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	64 +0%	64 +0%
Valorant	86 +0%	86 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Dota 2	41 +0%	41 +0%
Elden Ring	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry 5	69 +0%	69 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	40 +0%	40 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	45 +0%	45 +0%
World of Tanks	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Dota 2	113 +0%	113 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Elden Ring	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
World of Tanks	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Dota 2	46 +0%	46 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Fortnite	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

This is how P2000 Mobile and T2000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

T2000 Max-Q is 27% faster in 1080p
T2000 Max-Q is 24% faster in 1440p
T2000 Max-Q is 23% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.71	17.96
Recency	15 February 2019	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	3.75 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	40 Watt

T2000 Max-Q has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, a 6.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.