Radeon Pro 5500M vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

P2000 Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5
16.86

Radeon Pro 5500M outperforms Quadro P2000 Mobile by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking299288
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.344.64
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGP107GLNavi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date5 July 2017 (6 years ago)13 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$1477 $1950

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro 5500M has 39% better value for money than P2000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681536
Core clock speed1215 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate77.14139.2

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 5500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Mobile 16.86
Pro 5500M 17.64
+4.6%

Radeon Pro 5500M outperforms Quadro P2000 Mobile by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

P2000 Mobile 8387
Pro 5500M 14725
+75.6%

Radeon Pro 5500M outperforms Quadro P2000 Mobile by 76% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

P2000 Mobile 6847
Pro 5500M 10399
+51.9%

Radeon Pro 5500M outperforms Quadro P2000 Mobile by 52% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

P2000 Mobile 43566
Pro 5500M 65776
+51%

Radeon Pro 5500M outperforms Quadro P2000 Mobile by 51% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

P2000 Mobile 350317
Pro 5500M 364184
+4%

Radeon Pro 5500M outperforms Quadro P2000 Mobile by 4% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−14%
57
+14%
1440p45−50
−8.9%
49
+8.9%
4K30−35
−6.7%
32
+6.7%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 16.86 17.64
Recency 5 July 2017 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 5500M.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 80 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 242 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.