Radeon Pro 5600M vs Quadro P2000 Mobile
Aggregated performance score
Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms Quadro P2000 Mobile by 43% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 299 | 211 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 3.34 | no data |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Navi / RDNA (2019−2020) |
| GPU code name | GP107GL | Navi 10 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 July 2017 (6 years ago) | 15 June 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $1477 | no data |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1265 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,300 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 77.14 | 164.8 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1540 MBps |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.13 GB/s | 394.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 16.87 | 24.05 |
| Recency | 5 July 2017 | 15 June 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
