FirePro W7000 vs Quadro P1000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5
11.49
+4.1%

Quadro P1000 outperforms FirePro W7000 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking380390
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money7.446.72
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Pitcairn
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 February 2017 (7 years old)13 June 2012 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 $899
Current price$301 (0.8x MSRP)$195 (0.2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P1000 has 11% better value for money than FirePro W7000.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401280
Core clock speed1493 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate59.2076.00
Floating-point performance1,894 gflops2,432 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm242 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s153.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
StereoOutput3Dno data1
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI supportno data1

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA6.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.49
+4.1%
FirePro W7000 11.04

Quadro P1000 outperforms FirePro W7000 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P1000 4452
+4.1%
FirePro W7000 4276

Quadro P1000 outperforms FirePro W7000 by 4% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P1000 14136
FirePro W7000 18734
+32.5%

FirePro W7000 outperforms Quadro P1000 by 33% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
4K11
+10%
10−12
−10%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Hitman 3 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Hitman 3 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Hitman 3 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how Quadro P1000 and FirePro W7000 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Quadro P1000 is 12.5% faster than FirePro W7000

4K resolution:

  • Quadro P1000 is 10% faster than FirePro W7000

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 11.49 11.04
Recency 1 February 2017 13 June 2012
Cost $375 $899
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 350 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P1000 and FirePro W7000.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
AMD FirePro W7000
FirePro W7000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 460 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 52 votes

Rate AMD FirePro W7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.