FirePro D500 vs Quadro P1000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5
11.51
+7.6%

Quadro P1000 outperforms FirePro D500 by a small 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking383395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.302.63
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Tahiti
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 February 2017 (7 years ago)18 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 no data
Current price$301 (0.8x MSRP)$475

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P1000 has 178% better value for money than FirePro D500.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401536
Core clock speed1493 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt274 Watt
Texture fill rate59.2069.60
Floating-point performance1,894 gflops2,227 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm279 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s243.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA6.1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
4K11
+10%
10−12
−10%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Hitman 3 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 29
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Hitman 3 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how Quadro P1000 and FirePro D500 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P1000 is 13% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P1000 is 10% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.51 10.70
Recency 1 February 2017 18 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 274 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P1000 and FirePro D500.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 477 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.