Tesla P40 vs Quadro P1000

Place in the ranking	415	177
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.71	2.76
Power efficiency	20.08	8.80
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GP107	GP102
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 February 2017 (7 years ago)	13 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$375	$5,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P1000 has 107% better value for money than Tesla P40.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	3840
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	1303 MHz
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz	1531 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	48.61	367.4
Floating-point processing power	1.555 TFLOPS	11.76 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	96
TMUs	32	240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	267 mm
Width	MXM Module	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	1808 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	347.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	6.1	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.64

Tesla P40 31.91
+174%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4475

Tesla P40 12266
+174%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	46 −161%	120−130 +161%
4K	11 −173%	30−35 +173%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	8.15 +483%	47.49 −483%
4K	34.09 +457%	189.97 −457%

Quadro P1000 has 483% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Quadro P1000 has 457% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −162%	55−60 +162%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −161%	60−65 +161%
Elden Ring	30−35 −165%	90−95 +165%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −163%	100−105 +163%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −162%	55−60 +162%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −161%	60−65 +161%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −166%	85−90 +166%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −167%	80−85 +167%
Valorant	45−50 −167%	120−130 +167%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −163%	100−105 +163%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −162%	55−60 +162%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −161%	60−65 +161%
Dota 2	40−45 −162%	110−120 +162%
Elden Ring	30−35 −165%	90−95 +165%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%
Fortnite	41 −168%	110−120 +168%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −162%	110−120 +162%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −166%	85−90 +166%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	103 −172%	280−290 +172%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −167%	80−85 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −171%	95−100 +171%
Valorant	45−50 −167%	120−130 +167%
World of Tanks	160−170 −147%	400−450 +147%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −163%	100−105 +163%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −162%	55−60 +162%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −161%	60−65 +161%
Dota 2	40−45 −162%	110−120 +162%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 −173%	240−250 +173%
Valorant	45−50 −167%	120−130 +167%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Elden Ring	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −170%	170−180 +170%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
World of Tanks	80−85 −165%	220−230 +165%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −161%	60−65 +161%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −169%	70−75 +169%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −159%	70−75 +159%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −171%	65−70 +171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Valorant	27−30 −159%	75−80 +159%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Dota 2	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Elden Ring	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −165%	90−95 +165%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Dota 2	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Fortnite	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Valorant	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%

This is how Quadro P1000 and Tesla P40 compete in popular games:

Tesla P40 is 161% faster in 1080p
Tesla P40 is 173% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.64	31.91
Recency	7 February 2017	13 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	250 Watt