AMD FirePro S9000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

M4000M
16.06
+23.1%

Quadro M4000M outperforms FirePro S9000 by 23% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking307356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.354.22
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Tahiti
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years old)24 August 2012 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499
Current price$832 $433 (0.2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro S9000 has 26% better value for money than M4000M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,2801792
Core clock speed975 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1013 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate78.00100.8
Floating-point performance2,496 gflops3,226 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro M4000M and FirePro S9000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz5500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s264 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort
Display Port1.2no data
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI supportno data1

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M4000M 16.06
+23.1%
FirePro S9000 13.05

Quadro M4000M outperforms FirePro S9000 by 23% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M4000M 6225
+23%
FirePro S9000 5059

Quadro M4000M outperforms FirePro S9000 by 23% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
+26%
50−55
−26%
4K20
+25%
16−18
−25%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Hitman 3 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Hitman 3 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

This is how M4000M and FirePro S9000 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • M4000M is 26% faster than FirePro S9000

4K resolution:

  • M4000M is 25% faster than FirePro S9000

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 16.06 13.05
Recency 2 October 2015 24 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 350 Watt

The Quadro M4000M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while FirePro S9000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
AMD FirePro S9000
FirePro S9000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 116 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 7 votes

Rate AMD FirePro S9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.