Radeon RX 5700 XT vs FirePro W7170M

Place in the ranking	513	90
Place by popularity	not in top-100	54
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	45.83
Power efficiency	5.67	13.15
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Amethyst	Navi 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	2 October 2015 (9 years ago)	7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2560
Core clock speed	723 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1905 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.54	304.8
Floating-point processing power	2.961 TFLOPS	9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	128	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
VR Ready	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W7170M 8.22

RX 5700 XT 42.88
+422%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W7170M 3161

RX 5700 XT 16486
+422%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

W7170M 9708

RX 5700 XT 35823
+269%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

W7170M 26345

RX 5700 XT 83961
+219%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

W7170M 6935

RX 5700 XT 26189
+278%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

W7170M 43124

RX 5700 XT 146093
+239%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	54 −135%	127 +135%
1440p	14−16 −443%	76 +443%
4K	9−10 −433%	48 +433%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.14
1440p	no data	5.25
4K	no data	8.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −481%	93 +481%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −388%	78 +388%
Elden Ring	21−24 −478%	133 +478%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −258%	93 +258%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −375%	76 +375%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −413%	82 +413%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −609%	234 +609%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −609%	156 +609%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −400%	115 +400%
Valorant	27−30 −555%	190 +555%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −646%	194 +646%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −300%	64 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −350%	72 +350%
Dota 2	27−30 −338%	127 +338%
Elden Ring	21−24 −583%	157 +583%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −62.9%	57 +62.9%
Fortnite	45−50 −279%	180−190 +279%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −485%	193 +485%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −400%	145 +400%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −405%	111 +405%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −278%	246 +278%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −187%	66 +187%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −520%	150−160 +520%
Valorant	27−30 −286%	112 +286%
World of Tanks	120−130 −127%	270−280 +127%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −212%	81 +212%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −256%	57 +256%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −294%	63 +294%
Dota 2	27−30 −255%	103 +255%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −189%	100−110 +189%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −418%	171 +418%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −218%	200−210 +218%
Valorant	27−30 −448%	159 +448%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	9−10 −778%	79 +778%
Elden Ring	10−12 −700%	88 +700%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 −690%	79 +690%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −327%	170−180 +327%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −500%	42 +500%
World of Tanks	55−60 −359%	270−280 +359%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −433%	80 +433%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −260%	36 +260%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −550%	39 +550%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −712%	130−140 +712%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −600%	119 +600%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −643%	104 +643%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −670%	75−80 +670%
Valorant	21−24 −467%	119 +467%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%
Dota 2	18−20 −316%	79 +316%
Elden Ring	5−6 −680%	39 +680%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −339%	79 +339%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −775%	35 +775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −500%	144 +500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −440%	27 +440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −339%	79 +339%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −643%	52 +643%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −2150%	45−50 +2150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −750%	17 +750%
Dota 2	18−20 −389%	93 +389%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −560%	65−70 +560%
Fortnite	8−9 −688%	60−65 +688%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −689%	71 +689%
Valorant	8−9 −675%	62 +675%

This is how W7170M and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 5700 XT is 135% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 XT is 443% faster in 1440p
RX 5700 XT is 433% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 2150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 5700 XT surpassed W7170M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.22	42.88
Recency	2 October 2015	7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	225 Watt

W7170M has 125% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 421.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W7170M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W7170M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.