Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M6000
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2000 with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2000
2016
4 GB 128-bit, 75 Watt
10.34

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms M2000 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking442425
Place by popularitynot in top-10026
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.63no data
Power efficiency9.45no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGM206Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 April 2016 (8 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$437.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76896
Core clock speed796 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1163 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.82no data
Floating-point processing power1.786 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length201 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitDDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1653 MHzno data
Memory bandwidthUp to 106 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 47 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.34 10.94
Recency 8 April 2016 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has a 5.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M2000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7.

Be aware that Quadro M2000 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
ATI HD 4890 Radeon HD 4890
vs
ATI HD 5830 Radeon HD 5830
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
R7 Graphics Radeon R7 Graphics
vs
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
vs
RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
RX 540 Radeon RX 540
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
GT 820M GeForce GT 820M
vs
GT 425M GeForce GT 425M
R9 M375X Radeon R9 M375X
vs
FirePro M5100 FirePro M5100
Xbox One S GPU Xbox One S GPU
vs
GT 1030 DDR4 GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 210 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2549 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.